As a long time reader of Marie Claire journal, I was most depressed to study Gretchen Voss attacking Pastor Melissa Scott in a current problem. I had generally imagined Marie Claire celebrated the individuality of females, and our flexibility to both of those treatment for ourselves and do what we want with our professions. This report was so out of sync with what Marie Claire purports to be, I discovered it hard to believe that that a person of my favored reads could have authorized a thing like this.
This posting starts off off with Gretchen Voss enjoying the function of a self-righteous preacher who mainly condemns Pastor Melissa Scott to hell simply because Scott "allegedly" posed nude when she was young.
If you beloved this article and also you would like to collect more info regarding https://mariepavlenko.com/ nicely visit the site.
Of system Scott hardly ever confirms nor denies the accusation, but Voss functions as if it is an open up and shut situation and immediately jumps to the summary that Scott is of the very same ilk as Swaggert and Bakker.
I experienced to shake my head in question, mainly because in one more report, Voss celebrates her personal freedom of alternative to terminate her being pregnant. Voss's position on that topic is barely one particular that ideal-wingers would warm up to. But then she flip-flops when dealing with Scott, and in a total purpose-reversal, crawls into bed with the Christian Fundamentalists and commences railing on Pastor Melissa Scott (for alleged "earlier sins") worse than any appropriate-wing zealot. I've examine Christian Fundamentalists who weblog about just the exact factors that Gretchen was indicating. In reality, it just about seems like Gretchen Voss took the tale straight off the Fundamentalist Weblog web-sites. They say Pastor Scott should not be allowed to preach due to the fact she's a girl since she's not righteous, since of her alleged previous, and so on. These blogs created me sick, and Gretchen's copycat article tends to make me even sicker.